Have You Ever Wondered
Just Exactly How Much
Your Money Is Really Worth?

FACT
In 1834 the American Dollar was worth
1/20th of an ounce of gold.

money comes in many disguises, most of them today are soft and elastic.

FACT
NO U.S. Federal Budget has been balanced
since leaving the gold standard
NONE!

EPIGRAMS ABOUT MONEY

Great countries that go off the gold standard do not stay great for long. --  Ronald Reagan

What this country needs is a good five-cent cigar.  Thomas Riley Marshall

You shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns, you shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.  William Jennings Bryan

Once upon a time, government budgets were balanced, our money was sound, the streets were safe, and taxes imposed by all levels of government took less than 10% of our income. -- Harry Browne

Copyright © 2004-2009
by Lin Stone
All Rights Reserved

  A Foreword From The Author 

As you begin reading this treatise on the three legged dollar, please resist the temptation to think you  "know" where I am headed with it.  These are my words and MY ideas, not some empty phrases plucked up from op-eds published in the local newspaper.  And Yes, I realize most people are not ready to take so huge a step as I propose here. My message here about money is written for generations yet to come when these truths will be self-evident, a time when the future American housewife needs a mark on her forehead to buy her bread and a wheelbarrow to haul her money to market in so she can bring home a dozen eggs for her starving children.

Before we start, we also need to face some facts.
Fact #1: America is no longer rich; 
Fact #2: America’s biggest claim to monetary fame today is that it now owes Communist China more money than any other nation on earth.. Last year alone, we ended our financial fiasco owing Red China $232.5 billion more than we could pay back, or barter goods for.  Our auto industry is crumbling.  Our financial institutions needed massive bailouts just to keep a nose above the waters of insolvency.  We can't protect our borders from invasion at home, we can't win a war with little old Iraq, now we're rushing off to Pakistan and Turkey, and North Korea is thumbing its nose at US.  Hobbled at home, bruised abroad, it is little wonder inflation holds the reins of power over what was once coveted as the soundest money on earth.  Inflation is king and as long as this nation believes that more inflation is the only answer inflation will continue to be king.

People have been squabbling over the nature and cause of inflation since time began. 

What does it?

You've probably been taught that inflation is something that "just happens" to the economy.  I'm telling you that inflation is something governments do to the economy.  That has been true for the last fifty centuries and it will still be true tomorrow.  It is also true that every government entity seeks ever more monetary donations from its citizens. 

The government will have to borrow nearly 50 cents for every dollar it spends this year, exploding the record federal deficit past $1.8 trillion under new White House estimates. Budget office figures released Monday would add $89 billion to the 2009 red ink — increasing it to more than four times last year's all-time high as the government hands out billions more than expected for people who have lost jobs -- and takes in less tax revenue from people and companies making less money.

The unprecedented deficit figures flow from the deep recession, the Wall Street bailout and the cost of President Barack Obama's economic stimulus bill — as well as a seemingly embedded structural imbalance between what the government spends and what it takes in.

When citizens grow unruly about donating too much then the government entity diversifies its source of income.  For example: President Taft proposed a constitutional amendment on June 16, 1909 in an address to Congress to allow federal income taxes on individuals and an excise tax "upon the privilege of doing business as an artificial entity and of freedom from a general partnership liability enjoyed by those who own the stock"
On February 25, 1913, the Secretary of State, Philander Knox, proclaimed that the amendment had been ratified by the necessary three-fourths of the states, and thus had become part of the Constitution. Subsequently, the Revenue Act of 1913, an income tax, was passed by the Congress.

Only an innocuous 1% was collected at first.  Can you imagine how grateful you would feel if you went back to 1% today?  Yet Congress was uneasy about possible reactions to the 1% tax.  When no rebellion ensued, the tax was doubled and a confiscation of 2% became standard fare. 

During the Great Depression that followed, that "Indomitable Citizen of the United States" meekly put his face down deep into the mud and kissed the hand that bit him until assessments of up to 75% were meekly accepted with gratitude; "At least it isn't me!" 

Unfortunately, any of the grumbling was done in dark shadows and came from lips that trembled in terror that they might be singled out as heirs of their great American Patriot forefathers.  Along with losing the right to own our own property US lost the right to privacy.  Tax collectors can bust into your home without a search warrant and confiscate all your papers, receipts and deeds in an effort to ascertain just how much you MIGHT be hiding.  Don't believe for one second that such invasions only happen to men like Al Capone; ANY citizen of the United States can be so invaded and property confiscated, sold at auction and then that citizen made responsible for any subsequent indebtedness decreed by the invading agent. 

"Oh, they have to make assessments by law."  No, SORRY, they don't; they go by estimation and inclination.  If you are belligerent you will get socked in the gut much harder than if you meekly kneel down to put your face deep into the mud and kiss the hand that bites you.

Another Way To Steal

Adam Smith, author of the still much studied book The Wealth of Nations, says that historically "the avarice and injustice of princes and sovereign states, abusing the confidence of their subjects, have by degrees diminished the real quantity of metal, which had been originally contained in their coins."

He then mentions that the English coins (at that time) were only worth 1/3 what they had been, and that the French government had reduced theirs to 1/66 of its original value, all in order that the rulers could pay off their debts with money worth far less than it had been when they borrowed it.

History repeats itself, repeatedly. 
Compared to just fifty years ago, right now all the money you have is worthless.

Your Money is not backed up by gold.

It is not backed up by silver.

The only thing backing your money up is inflation. 
Inflation has your dollar backed up to the wall.

I invite you to join me in the next frame

Is your money SAFE in the bank? 
Miracles happen daily inside banks,
but so does sleight of hand.

The Typology of Financial Scandals
Can you recognize a scam?

***

"Money is better than poverty,
if only for financial reasons." 
Woody Allen

***

EVERY MAJOR WAR
has precipitated a departure from the gold standard
and the advancement of legalized counterfeiting.

 

In 1919 the American Dollar was still sound enough
That 11 of them could feed a family of 5 for one whole week.

Item and amount Cost,
October,
1919
Item and amount Cost,
October,
1919
       
Meat and Fish   Fruit  
2 lbs. flank $   .32  3 qts. apples $   .27 
2 lbs. chuck .40  3 oranges .12 
½ lb. bacon .21  4 bananas .15 
1 lb. dried cod .20  ½ lb. raisins .12 
1 can salmon .27  1 lb. prunes .24 
Dairy Products   Bread, Cereals, etc.  
1 doz. eggs .61  12 lbs. bread 1.28 
1 lb. butter .66  2 lbs. flour .16 
½ lb. oleomargarine or lard .18  1 lb. corn meal .07 
1 lb. cheese .41  1 lb. rice .16 
14 qts. milk 2.10  1 lb. macaroni .16 
Vegetables   3 lbs. sugar .33 
1½ pks. potatoes .77  3 lbs. rolled oats .21 
3 lbs. carrots .12  1 pt. molasses .12 
2 lbs. onions .13  Tea, Coffee, etc.  
3 lbs. cabbage .14  ¼ lb. tea .15 
2 lbs. dried beans .23  ½ lb. coffee .23 
1 can tomatoes .15  ½ lb. cocoa .22 
    Condiments .11 
       
        Total weekly cost $11.00 

 

 

Not long before Interstate highways, modern factories and the miracle advances of super electronics were on the scene, merchants, suppliers and manufacturers could all make a profit on a pair of pants which sold retail for one dollar. And there was NO sales tax for customers to fork over. 
Today the same kind of pants sell for $30 a pair.
"But wait a minute," you say. "That isn't the same money. Some people were working for 10 cents an hour back then, today they won't work for less than $4.25."

Old Buddy, the problem is that it IS the same money.  The only difference is how much highway robbery the American public is willing to overlook now.  Maybe you're smart enough to count up the costs of some of the thefts.  Let's do some more counting:  At 10 cents an hour it took 10 hours of work by the common back to buy a pair of pants in 1900, but let's remember that was with no taxes to fiddle with.
At $4.25 an hour you'd still be working a whole 7.06 hours for that pair of pants.
Yes.  Yes, I know -- you are impatiently frowning at my stupidity already, but we're not through counting yet.
From that $4.25 per hour -- because of increased taxes --  you only get to use $2.39 for spending purposes.  Therefore, in actual spendable income, when you revalue today's scandalized buck so you can compare it with yesterday's slightly sounder dollar you are only earning $0.096 an hour. That means that in spite of all the modern technology we now have that has increased productivity 340%, today's common laborer is earning less than the common laborer of 1900 was at ten cents an hour!  That's right.  In real money US poor people are earning less than a dime an hour. 

Okay, Okay. I'll concede that today's pants do look better on women -- if you will concede that by adding in the 14% sales taxes collected on that $30 pair of pants to our figures here – that the year 2000 workers would be even worse off.

What does our future look like?


We Will Have Money,
We Will Have Wads of Money!

*

Here's another lie you hear every day!

The national debt doesn't matter
"because we owe all that money to ourselves."

he-he-he

*

The Outstanding Public Debt as of 11 Jan 2005 at 09:38:45 PM GMT is:
$7,603,373,296,756.63
The estimated population of the United States is 295,297,295
so each citizen's share of this debt is:
$25,748.20
.

But, it doesn't matter, because we owe all this money to ourselves!

He-He-He!

I keep hearing this myth -- and Yes, I do maintain that wet-noodle excuse for not thinking is a myth.  If we owed all that money to ourselves it would be painless for US if we just tell our Congressional Representatives, "Please put forth an initiative letting us Forgive Ourselves Of This Debt.  Just write it off the books and let's quit charging ourselves all this interest."

Wait, where are these screams coming from that we hear?  Is it you screaming?  No.  Your wallet feels good.  Is it me?  No,  My wallet is fatter than ever. 

Well, somebody's in pain, and whoever is screaming is the one our National Debt is really owed to even though we have been told for all our lives was just owed to ourselves.  Why -- I believe that scream is coming from across the ocean.  There must be somebody over there that thinks we owe this money to them.  Don't worry about it, our politicians will explain their loss to them in such a way that none of US are shot down.

The National Debt has continued to increase an average of:
$2.17 billion per day since September 30, 2004!

Next month, the United States will pay $208 billion in interest alone on the National Debt. That is just the interest. Interest buys us nothing, stops nothing, does nothing. It doesn't buy levees.  It doesn't build highways.  It doesn't stop bullets.  It won't even make bread rise. The only thing interest does is roll the debt over so the other side will be exposed.

Why do we owe so much money to ourselves?

In the latest home investment fiasco Hillary Clinton, then a first term New York Senator, said the Federal Housing Administration should stand ready to buy, restructure and resell failed mortgages to strengthen the ailing economy.

"Just as it has in the past, this kind of temporary measure by the government could give our economy the boost it needs and families the help they need," Clinton said in a speech in Philadelphia.

First Term Senator Clinton then gushes on to reassure us: "It would not require a single new government bureaucracy, and would be designed to be self-financing over time -- so it would cost taxpayers nothing in the long run," she explained.

With her eyes gleaming brightly in the limelight, the right Honorable Senator Clinton said she would propose legislation to provide mortgage companies with protection against the threat of lawsuits from investors who have bought the loans.

Why do you suppose she would want to add this stipulation?  Why the fair lady tells us herself: "Many mortgage companies are reluctant to help families restructure their mortgages because they're afraid of being sued by the investment banks, the private equity firms and others who actually own the mortgage papers," she said.


Oh, so THAT'S who will profit from this measure!  (Remember, You can always tell who is benefiting most from any law by listening to see who squawks the loudest when it becomes threatened)

Whose economy will be helped by measures like this? 

  1. The Bankers love the idea because all their risk has been subsidized; they won't have lost one yuan over this deal.
  2. The buyers won't lose any money so long as they hang on and cry piteously for a bailout.
  3. The high-level group of economic experts won't be overwhelmed with distress either because they have every intention to charge Big Bucks to produce relief to soiled economies.  Senatora Clinton proposes this one be led by former Federal Reserve Chairmen Alan Greenspan and Paul Volcker and former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin.  Do YOU associate these names with solid economic relief?
  4. The Mainland Chinese are happy because -- to keep its economy from tottering -- the U.S.  will again be borrowing more money from China

Is the U.S. the only country playing footsie with the economy?  Oh no.  The United States only has $12.3 trillion worth of external debt and a $14.6 trillion GDP for an 84% debt-to-GDP ratio."
Switzerland’s external debt of $1.3 trillion equals 433% of its $300 billion GDP.
The United Kingdom’s external debt of $10.5 trillion equals 456% of its $2.3 trillion GDP.
Ireland’s external debt, at $1.8 trillion, equals 900% of the country’s $200 billion GDP.

Do you have the nerve to drop down into South America and ask how well those governments are doing?

Sometimes I get to thinking every politician on earth is either stupid, or thinks we are.

You know what's really crazy?  Any time some big bank or corporation loses a little dab of money they will scream to their public benefactors (that's US) and ask for a bailout!

Back when money HAD
to be worth something
How much
could
our money buy?

An estimate by James R. Rawl indicates that there were 650 whaling vessels grossing 193,000 tons and manned by 16,000 officers and men active in the sperm oil industry just before the American Revolutionary War.

To equip the 650 whalers for just one voyage required an aggregate of

100,000 barrels of flour at six dollars a barrel,
32,500 barrels of corn at 70 cents a barrel.
6,500 bushels of beans at one dollar and twenty five cents,
1,300,000 pounds of tobacco at eleven cents a pound,
65,000 bushels of potatoes at thirty five cents a bushel,
650,000 pounds of rice at three cents a bushel,
325,000 pounds of cheese at eight cents a pound,
325,000 pounds of butter at seventeen cents a pound,
3,900 barrels of vinegar, averaging three dollars a barrel,
404,000 pounds of sugar worth around eight cents a pound,
404,000 pounds of coffee at ten cents a pound.

Therefore, from before the Revolution to 1919
it took half a dollar to buy what a dime could buy.

How much coffee will ten cents
buy in your neighborhood today?

I'll bet a dime won't even buy a whole cup full!

Let the politicians earn their trust with the public

Remember when a quarter was worth a gallon of gas? You could take a dollar down to the gas station and buy four whole gallons!  Not only that, they washed the windshield, checked the oil, and inflated the tires properly without asking for more money. At that time our dollar was backed by real silver, even a little dab of gold when necessary.  The green stuff that the Fed fobs off on you now won't even buy a fistful of Monopoly Money.

Why Do They Print More Money?

We NEED MORE MONEY! That has always been the government's excuse for printing more money. Money makes the world go round, therefore we need to print more money to go around. No, huh, uh! Printing more money just makes money worth less, and that cheats the poor people that make our money valuable. Way back in 1935 when our friend Rooseyvelt confiscated all the gold American citizens had, what we should have done was make our money more valuable BY DIVIDING IT.

Divide it?” Yes. Money is a lot like real estate. If you have a thousand acres worth $10,000 an acre you can make it far more valuable by DIVIDING it up so more people can take advantage of it. Land has to be in the right place at the right time to be enhanced by subdivision, and money has to be in the right time to divide it up too.

How can you divide money up?” Take the good old American dollar. It will have to be an old dollar because the Representatives of the people have been savaging our economy for their friends ever since Hamilton got his face plastered on a piece of paper. So yes, let's go back to gold for just a moment. Tricky Dick said he had to take us off the gold standard because there wasn't any gold left to back up our dollar. I won't go into the stupidity we the people let bring us to that point. Let's just make it status quo. Virtually every ounce of gold we had has been shipped off to pay for our little affairs outside the country. Yes, yes, don't argue this point. If we had owed it to anyone in the United States our gold would still be here. It might not be ours individually but it would still be here with men like Charles Schwaab grinning broadly while we paid the rent for the storage shed that protected their gold. But I will say that the only reason our gold was frittered away is the same one that has our country bankrupt today: we (collectively) have been spending more than we earned.

Okay, let's get back to status quo again so we can take off in a different direction. The status is that 35 paper dollars are worth an ounce of gold before Tricky Dick tricked us off down the primrose lane. But let's go down another lane and divide our money up so as to make 10 paper dollars worth an ounce of gold.

Huh? You're going in the wrong direction.”

Oh, if we had started behaving ourselves in a sensible financial manner before Roosevelt stole our gold we could have done this one little step at a time. $34 an ounce, $33 an ounce, $32 an ounce. You know, one step at a time, we could have made our money more valuable, and because it became more valuable – like real estate getting scarcer when we need it more – we could have sub-divided it. You younguns will have to imagine a time when a silver dollar was made out of silver but I can assure you that once upon a time our money was so valuable that one dollar would buy an ounce of silver, and a quarter would buy – HEY, a quarter ounce! Amazing what systems those old fogeys dreamed up, isn't it? Let's drop on down a bit here and invent pennies that are worth their weight in – copper. YES!

I'm only 66 years old and I can personally remember vividly being able to buy two pieces of candy for a penny. You take a penny to the store today and tell me how much candy you can buy. However, if we had come to our collective senses and sub-divided our money back then, today a penny would have bought a pound of candy.

HUH?” That kind of thinking boggles the mind, doesn't it? It's about the same feeling George Washington would have experienced if he had been told that one fourth of an acre could be worth a million dollars. Why, his wooden teeth would have fallen right out of his mouth, his incredulity would have been so great. “Where? Where at is this property so valuable?” New York, New York City to be even more precise. George, these little wooden buildings will be chopped down for firewood and up, up, up higher than the tallest tree you can imagine, will sprout these buildings of steel and concrete that can hold thousands of people at one time – thousands and thousands of people at one time, and every one of them can be taxed to pay the President's salary.

By this time George has gone out cold and is stretched full length on the concrete sidewalk. Let's step around old George and hop on down this new trail we have discovered.

Yeah, let's throw our shoulders back bravely and be REAL proactive here, since you haven't fainted yet. The reason money fuels the economy is because it changes hands easily. Once upon a time 35 paper dollars was worth an ounce of gold. We need more money to change hands so everyone can feel like their palm has been greased. So let's make 35 CENTS worth an ounce of gold. If you think of this step like real estate you won't be lying down there beside George on the sidewalk.

Now remember, we have only gone back a few years. Good britches only cost about $5 a pair back then – No, no. That's wrong. Back then 5 paper dollars would have bought a good pair of britches, I think you call them jeans these days and you pay from $50 to $250 for the same quality I used to wear – britches sold for $5 and jeans for $50, who was smarter?

So, what we are going to do is sub-divide our money so that PANTS can be bought for 50 CENTS. In other words, after sub-dividing our money, 50 cents are now worth a pair of pants. Same quality, and they look just as good on girls as ever, wonderful, huh? Wonderful, gleaming, brand new financial policy – sub-dividing our money.

Let's grab that penny by the nape of the neck and shake it a few times until it is sub-divided into one hundred units that we will invent the word MILLS for. We now have some new coins to work with. One hundred of them are worth one of today's pennies. No wonder people are willing to work for 7 cents an hour. Even illegal aliens will realize that when people are willing to work for 7 cents an hour then 7 cents is worth an hour of labor.

We also have a 50 mill piece and a 25 mill piece, a 10 mill piece and a 5 mill piece. One penny is now worth as much as the dollar was yesterday. The dollar is now worth as much as it was 80 years ago. George, are you still down there on the sidewalk? Stand up like a man and look at this new money we've got. That worthless piece of paper with your picture on it is now worth almost a whole dollar again!

Why call our new coins “mills?” The word mill goes hand in glove with a basic unit of taxes called MILLAGE. If the tax collector accepts them, who can argue with this new terminology?

Okay, we have sub-divided our currency, now WHO is going to work for less than they were getting?”

Well, I'm glad you asked. Let's start with those public-spirited servants in Washington D.C.. I'm sure they'll be glad to work for less.  Why, back in 1847 they were glad to earn just $8 per day.  It makes sense to me if we start out by paying them what they are worth and see where we go from there.

Them? Take a pay cut? Why, that's the dumbest thing you've said today! Them people want more bonus for all the mistakes they make than if they had run a big corporation into the ground!”

You're right. We might have to take a club to them.

 

Back when the common back earned $1.00 per hour by the sweat of its brow gas was selling for fifty cents a gallon.  Now that most American backs are earning at least $6.00 per hour it is only natural that the price of gas should rise to $34.00 per gallon.  Considering the quality of our newest fuels, the price has actually gone down quite a bit.
While none of us likes the newest price of fuel, let's remember that none of us were happy with fifty cents a gallon either.
In short, the only reason that people are living better today is the effect of the great technological advances that business and science (not the government) have made -- more efficient cars, better roads, better fuel, the super sergers and of course -- that great miracle of electronics, et al.
.
However, the only reason we are not 10 times as far ahead is that we've been letting the lawyers heading up our government corrupt the value of our money through inflation. Indeed, if we had not let the government monkey with our money, if the value of each denomination of our currency had remained fixed, we would be far better off because hopefully, we would quite sensibly have resisted such outright robbery of our resources.

There wasn't enough taxes to fiddle with at 10 cents an hour at the turn of the 20th century. Even as late as 1942 sales taxes were still only 1/10th of a cent.  Today the average wage earner is paying 31.2% in taxes on every dollar earned, according to the Wall Street Journal.  From 1800 until 1942 the value of money remained relatively stable.  From 1942 until 2000 your one dollar bill literally became worth ten cents.  How much is it worth today with ANOTHER 691,000 American jobs going overseas this year?

Every time wages go up, taxes increase faster than a speeding 1040 EZ.  As recently as 1950, all the individual income taxes collected by the Feds only came to $17 billion.
With a population of 150 million, that means that every man, woman and child in the U.S. would have been paying an equal share of $113 per person. Just 38 years later the Feds collected about $400 billion in individual income taxes from a population of 250 million. That means that our equal share came to 14.159292 times as much, or $1,600 each. 

I ask you this question: Why then aren't workers earning 14.159292 times as much as they did in 1950?

Remember too, during this same period states sales taxes have gone up an average of 70X -- from 1/10 of a cent on the dollar to 7 cents on the dollar.  Yes, I know many more than one state has 14% going for them, but that is just letting us know what the future will taste like, let's continue.

  Has the price of license plates gone up? 
        Are you now contributing more to that social security fund that's always "going broke" --  until they need to borrow money from it.
          Have property taxes risen slightly?
                  Are you paying more than fifty cents a gallon for gas?

If you ran out of gas on a trip when I was a kid you could leave your spare tire and get enough gas to get home on.  Today you can't even leave your car behind for enough gas to get home on!

The Minimum Wage Myth

The easiest way to pry more of our money from our pockets was to persuade us that we had more money for them to steal, therefore Presidents and Congress keep shouting about the necessity of raising the minimum wage -- as if that were going to help us poor people get over what they are doing to us.

Here's the real trap of raising the minimum wage to artificially compensate for inflation.  Any time our wages go up we naturally pay more taxes. 

Raising the minimum wage is the same thing the French Royalty did when they removed the tax on salt because rebellion was imminent, and then added double taxes on sugar -- or something else – so they still had just as much money coming in.  Are we going to go home and wait for a Napoleon dictator to take over our county -- like the French did?

When the minimum wage is raised we get a check with bigger numbers on it for the work we do. Within just a few months the only difference a poor man can see is bigger frustration because the price of everything else has risen to keep pace with his artificially inflated pay check.  Then we pay more taxes because we have slid over into a higher tax bracket.  This lets the government spend more.  What we end up with is we have less than ever, and have to work harder to catch up again.

On top of that, every time wages go up now,
politicians insist that the millage at which all
of our taxes are collected must go up as well
because THEY just can't cope with less.  

If that is true, then why do they expect US to cope with less?

Stop the Sham!

We don't need higher wages.  If the government REALLY wanted to help us cope financially there is only one thing that really works:

They can REALLY Lower our taxes instead of playing games with our money.

It now takes TWO wage earners per family where one working used to earn enough to keep body and soul together.  Even worse, instead of solid money, we are being paid off with money subject to constant theft by the inflation caused by these very politicians that promised us the moon if we would just elect them to office.

Not only are we being taxed --- that dollar earned today will only buy 92 cents worth of goodies tomorrow, and 80 cents by year's end. Before the decade is gone, it won't be worth a plugged nickel -- leaving us to scramble for our own old age security because the government is now buying itself enough votes to remain in office by giving our money to illegal aliens.

*

There is no denying the progress we have made lately: The mail runs almost as fast today as it did in 1900: And, we only have twice as many people going hungry now as then, too. People with a genuine ostrich mentality will insist on pointing out there are televisions today, computers, and paved roads from one end of the country to the other, not to mention hundreds of other wonders, like the Internet.

Well, my thought is: If the lawyers and politicians had left our money alone, all these improvements and increased productivity would have created so much wealth in the United States that the whole world could not hold it!

I maintain that ALL the progress we have ever made over the past two centuries can be traced to giving the common man more opportunity to gain wealth, not because he was being sorely taxed.  Let's ask..

Brother Eli, did you invent the sewing machine because you were taxed?  "Why bless my soul!Whatever gave you such a silly idea?"

Let's ask again.  Uncle Bill, did you invent any version of Windows because you were being taxed?  "Uh, let me think here.  No, I'm quite sure the answer is no.  Well now, maybe it was because I was being taxed so much that I was struggling hard just to keep my head above water.  I absolutely HAD to do something or I was going under."

Okay, let's ask again.  Mr. Industrialist, is your company so solvent now because the government has taxed you so much?  "Are you kidding?  I have to hire eight full time accountants and twelve lawyers just to take a stab at complying with governmental taxation and stupid laws!  Do you know what has the highest number infractions for OSHA compliance?  I'll tell you what's number one, TOP OF THE LIST -- I'm sorry.  I didn't mean to scream out my anguish.  The number one infraction is -- not hanging their sign up.  And number two is not hanging their sign in the right place."

Well there you have it from three different perspectives, and you still get the same answer.. Overtaxing the people is NOT improving the value of our money! 

Opportunities to create wealth is the only thing man needs for progress to be made.  Millionaire entrepreneurs are not essential.

Provide enough opportunity and God will provide enough opportunists.

If we just multiply the number of people who can make improvements we will subsequently multiply the number of improvements being made.

The more hope there is to get ahead,
the more wealth any nation will create.

However, when the little guy on the street believes there is no use to go on with his honest hustling then progress comes to a halt and the crack dealers proliferate.

Nothing generates enthusiasm like seeing genuine hope instead of tricky promises. With more money out there to grab, more people will be hustling to get a bigger share. Even those whose ventures fail will be throwing money back into the system at the grass roots where it is needed. Those whose ventures succeed will be creating more wealth at the ground level by working more efficiently than ever before, which is the very foundation of our national wealth.

Henry Ford perfected the process of deliberately putting more money into the hands of common laborers. Suddenly, the best people anywhere wanted to work for Ford.

This galvanized his entire operation.
By paying more real money, Henry Ford got better help.
By getting better help he reduced prices.
By reducing prices he made more sales.
That meant that more people could be hired and there was more money to spend on improvements.
It also meant that other manufacturers had to pay their good workers more, because if they didn't they would lose their best ones to Henry Ford.

More importantly, it gave common people money to spend right where it did the economy the most good.  Unfortunately, when the government saw that workers were earning more, politicians began wanting more than their share.

There are three basic ways for the government to get more money from us:
take it away by raising taxes,
borrow it and let US pay the interest,
print more paper without backing it up. 

Our government did all three, then did it again, and again, and again.
Each time there was a plausible excuse for the "necessity".
Each time, US workers ended up with less left in our pockets.

This isn't anything new.  It has been going on since long before William the Conqueror was a little baby.

If our money had at least been founded on something of solid, substantial value, it would have taken much longer for our pockets to come up plumb empty while Congress is voting themselves yet another pay raise and inexplicably experiencing a dramatic increase in the fortunes of their family and friends at the same time. To stop this travesty of justice, our monetary system must be founded on a commodity whose value never changes; and we must cast our tax structure in concrete so that it never rises.

*

This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it.  -- Abraham Lincoln.

Governors and mayors
all across the land 
are slashing taxes for 
and making loans to 
foreign companies in order to induce them to bring their management system in for us to suffer under. Newspapers herald such events with huge banners screaming:

CHRISTMAS 
COMES EARLY
For Our Community

Well, for goodness sakes,
if these foreigners are so much smarter
than we are then it is high time for US to:

import some foreign politicians!

*

If there were just some way we could make sure the value of our money is always the same, then the price of everything else will always reflect the precise value of that product or service to our society at that time. Consequently, the true value of the gross national product our country is able to produce would only rise and fall in the absolute terms of genuine wealth, never in false hopes or glittering promises.
Gold won't work.
Nor will silver.
When gold was our standard, Fort Knox was flooded with 
the stuff and it wasn't even earning interest.  
(All the gold we do have left there now is in hock.)
Keeping our gold bricks in a dungeon
didn't keep the dragon on a leash.
Our gold was just sitting there useless when it could have been working to make us more wealth.
Where is the sense of that?

If there were just some way we could make sure the value of our money is always the same, then the price of everything else will always reflect the precise value of that product or service to our society at that time. Centuries ago, in the still widely studied book The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith makes these shrewd observations: "The real price of everything, what everything really costs to the man who wants to acquire it, is the toil and trouble of acquiring it."
He added: "By (measuring) the quantities of labor we can, with the greatest accuracy estimate it both from century to century and year to year." 
In other words.. If we had to work an hour to buy a pound of sugar in one century and now we have to work two hours to buy a pound of sugar in the next century then we have lost half our buying power and we are working twice as hard as we used to be – no matter how much bigger the figures are on our paychecks. 
As Adam Smith so ably points out, this precise kind of measurement cannot be done with any other substance on earth! The cost of everything we have can be measured by how many hours we had to labor in order to purchase it – not just the sticker price ($0.99) but the sticker price PLUS the taxes. ($1.13) Now, with modern technology assisting us, the work can get easier, but within an earthly frame of reference, time never changes. An hour has sixty minutes in it. A minute has sixty seconds.

Therefore, if we anchor
the value of our dollars
to units of time spent in labor
then our economy is locked into reality.
To begin anchoring our money to time all we have to do is make the value of one dollar equal one hour of time at work.

One of our hours of time would equal one dollar. If every dollar you earn today is worth one hour of time then every dollar will still be worth one whole dollar even one hundred (or one thousand) years from now. In fact, if technology continues to improve, a dollar will actually increase in value. But, it will still be worth one hour of time.

Each one of us has 24 hours of time allotted to us each day. No one has any more than that. None of us receives any less. We are all equal in this respect. Through diligence, leverage, practice, training, education, efficiency, planning, or strength each of us has the opportunity to make the results of our time invested in work be of more value than the results of time at work invested by those around us do.
That is immaterial to the equation.
Time has not been stretched, or altered.
We still only have the same 24 hours others receive.
So, let one hour of time at work equal one dollar.
Let one dollar be worth one hour of time at work.
Obviously, if one dollar is to be worth one hour of time then
someone must be willing to provide one hour of work for that dollar.

There are those who (forgetting the all too recent past) will claim that one dollar an hour is too little to work for. That idea comes from looking at one of the paper dollars in our midst today, which won't even buy half a loaf of good bread.
However, just as a pair of pants was only $1.00 when wages were 10 cents an hour, if one dollar is worth one whole hour of work, then it necessarily follows that one (time) dollar will be worth enough to purchase just as much pants that one hour of work will now produce.
After the conversion happens all of our numerical prices will rearrange themselves to fit the new value of our currency.  
Better yet, as the results of our labor improve, the purchasing power of our money will increase.

*

The question comes up to many a mind, why not make one hour of time worth $10 so that it looks like we're earning more now than we are. 
That would be great, psychologically.
Unfortunately it would also put a devastating strain on the value of the coins we have to manufacture. If our wages are one dollar an hour then a penny made of copper would cost far less than a penny to make. At $10 an hour a penny made of copper would cost us far more than a penny to make.

We must save our pennies,
to keep Benjamin Franklin happy.
This will accomplish two important goals.
#1, it will insure that the elderly and the poor
can always get work done for them inexpensively.
#2, it will guarantee that prices for wages, goods and services
are always quickly stabilized in spite of swings caused by fluctuating supplies and demands.

General, common wages cannot go up excessively because people can have their money redeemed at one hour per dollar at any time. Our wages cannot fall below $1.00 per hour because the dollar is redeemed with labor. With our wages stabilized along with expenses, vendors will be compelled to maintain lower prices in order to remain competitive.
Consequently the bargains you see will be real bargains.
With this done, our money now has a solid redemption value which we can depend upon throughout our lives. A dollar earned in our youth cannot lose its value before our retirement. And if by our diligence, intelligence, wisdom, leverage, planning or training we have gathered more than those around us, then we shall reap more abundantly than they in our golden years. Inflation shall not rob us because inflation has been stopped dead in its tracks.
Naturally, each generic dollar is only worth one hour of general labor. It cannot therefore be redeemed for an hour of time from any specific person. Nor can it even be redeemed for the labor of a specific skill category. Since the dollar you own is generic, the laborer performing the redemption must be selected by chance.
This is in the redemptive sense only. The redemption of our currency is only desirable when its value is perceived as greater than available through normal spending habits. You can SPEND your money with anyone, or anywhere; it can only be REDEEMED from a labor pool selected by chance.
This precaution insures that there can never be an over abundance of currency put into circulation on us. And that in times of expansion the economy can be supplied with enough currency to fulfill the measure of its purpose. It therefore follows that to obtain that pool of labor a continuous supply of laborers must be generated.

This is a navigational menu tool.  Click anywhere to find a new and exciting exit to something we have that is wild and wonderful.

This is done by a citizen conscription.

Anyone wishing to obtain citizenship shall, besides the requirements already made for naturalized citizens, be required to provide One Hundred Hours of their time to the labor pool. Only by freely providing these hours can anyone become a citizen.
As each call for a redemption comes in, the next person on the list goes out, even if the grease trap needs cleaning or a yard raked. No more than 8 hours a day would be required of anyone at a time. When not on call, people in the pool could work anywhere else. However, their citizenship cannot become operative until all one hundred hours have been submitted.
Only those who value citizenship will put forth the effort to become citizens, thus ensuring a better class of voter. As their desire to become citizens is the power which provides the value of our currency, hard working new citizens will be welcomed. To make citizenship even more meaningful, only full citizens can own real estate, vote, hold public office, or possess firearms.
Once their price for citizenship has been paid, any citizen may return to the labor pool at the head of the line for as long as necessary to sustain themselves until able to earn a living elsewhere, only now they KEEP every dollar they earn, and the Treasury does not get a cent.
In other words, when the job market shrinks those people who are already citizens will have the privilege of securing what work is available at the lowest rung of the labor ladder, IF they need to. This is the safety net which insures there need be no homeless or financially helpless.
As long as there is money wanting to be redeemed then citizens will have the opportunity to work. When prosperity is growing, jobs will be plentiful and new citizens welcomed to keep enough money in circulation and inflation down -- Supply, and demand.
Once you obtain talents, skills, or resources which enable you to command better pay than $1.00 per hour then you are encouraged to do so.
And those people good enough to start and maintain their own business shall have that privilege jealously guarded. In the great spectrum of labor, each band shall be regulated according to the skill values set from within their own ranks. Like the guilds of old, each band of the spectrum shall establish their own standards of performance, anyone meeting those standards cannot be denied membership.
While anyone can change guilds as the monetary rewards fluctuate, no one can be a member of two or more guilds simultaneously without forfeiting the financial remuneration guaranteed by the guilds. To wit, each guild shall collect enough from its working members to pay all of those at the same rate who are not working.
By dropping the price of wages the guild will put more people to work. When there aren't enough people in the guild wages will go up to entice others into it. The minimum pay allotted to each rank they establish will be set by supply and demand for that particular talent, on a regional basis.
No employer can pay less than that amount to anyone working in the capacity of that rank, except for a private contractor. And, any of those working for any government branch or office shall not be paid more than the minimum for that rank.
When too much work is available, minimum wages will be raised across the board in order to induce more workers into that field. When the supply of workers exceeds the demand that rank will be compelled to reduce their acceptable minimum wage across the board.
This eliminates the need for unions --
while guaranteeing good wages for all qualified workers at the same time.
Government, being responsible for our fiscal policy, shall be held accountable for the redemption of our currency when more calls are made for redemption than the labor pool of prospective citizens can redeem.
When calls for redemption cannot be met because our fragile economy is getting fragged by politicians, then ALL those people working for the government shall immediately go on line. Their names shall be put on the the top of the list of available labor to redeem our currency.

When grass needs cutting,
THEY cut it.
When floors need scrubbing,
THEY scrub them.
In 8 hour sequences, chosen by lot
from the highest executive
to the lowest plebe,
they shall work without pay
to redeem the calls on our currency
until our currency IS sound again.

In conclusion -- Giving ourselves a dollar founded on honest value will 
create all the genuine hope any nation on earth could ever wish for.

Remember this for a fact..
We don't need more money.
We need our money to buy more.


Only when our dollars are worth more
will we have more real money to spend.

Only when we put a ceiling on what Government can waste
will we be able to halt the spiral of inflation.

It is time to make the government stop playing games with our money.
It is time to make our money worth every minute we put into it.

the end

Please tell your friends they can find this article at http://www.talewins.com/essays/money.htm  

Then ask your representatives to quit monkeying around with your money.  
Anyone who won't respond in less than two weeks needs to be replaced.

There are MORE  Hand-Picked Essays
in the following categories

Personal  *  Family  *  Inspirational  *  Helpful  *  Social  *  War  *  Freedom

Click HERE for our latest news.

Learn to Write From Examples

Travel the World, and get paid for it  *  Secrets of birding  *  Electronic Publishing  *  Essays
Family Essays  *  Freedom Essays  *  Helpful Articles  *  Humor  *  Inspirational Essays
Understanding the World of Insurance  *  Essays on Money  *  Resources for Writers
Social Essays  *  Free Software for Writers  *  The Native American World  *  War
Treasures for Kids  *  Novels to read online  *  The Almighty Dollar  *  Lin Stone

Keep up with all your new articles and freebies.